Kirkland v. DiLeo & City of Linden

The New Jersey Law Journal did not report that the Linden taxpayers are being sued as well as DiLeo.

Read complaint here:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/83946279

Federal Lawsuit Filed Against Former Municipal Judge

According to the New Jersey Law Journal, a federal lawsuit has been filed against former Linden judge Louis M.J. DiLeo in a suit entitled Kirkland v. DiLeo.  The suit alleges that the plaintiffs' constitutional rights were violated.

See here, here and here for background.

Are Linden taxpayers going to have the foot the bill for DiLeo's defense?

S.A.G. Settlement - 9 years later

Strategic Alliance Group.   I reached out to two council persons to find out the terms of the settlement  What is the settlement?  Council voted on it.  Why the secrecy?  The Settlement Agreement should be attached to the Resolution approving the settlement.  More importantly, it should be disclosed at the Council meeting and not just referred to in a Resolution.  TAXPAYERS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE PAYING.

Can anyone imagine waiting nine (9) years for a resolution to a lawsuit?   Besides which the Judge calls out your own lawyers' statements (here, that would be Linden's lawyers and for which, I believe we paid them over a million dollars) TO BE INAPPROPRIATE.  Yet Linden taxpayers gave these very lawyers even more money and that was back in 2010.  

Could it be that the lawyer's fees exceeded the recovery?  Probably.   The judge wasn't too kind to Linden's lawyers, which Judge had this to say back in 2010:

• "The City also stated that it would file a Motion to Enforce Settlement against the LaVans by the end of July. While no motion was filed in July, on December 8, 2008 the City moved to enforce its settlement agreement with the LaVans.Strategic Alliance Group, et al vs. City of Linden, et al."

• "Here neither the City nor the LaVans moved to reopen this matter within the 90 days provided by ¶1 of the Court’s Order of Dismissal."

• "Similarly, neither the City nor the LaVans ever made a request that the 90 day period set forth in ¶1 of the Court’s Order be extended.Instead, over 9 months or 270 days elapsed before any party informed the Court that there was an issue with the settlement reached in this matter."

• While the City may have believed that the matter was settled and that therefore there was no reason to move to reopen the case in accordance with ¶1, the City fails to explain why, when it became apparent that the settlement would not be consummated within 90 days, it failed to request that the 90 day period be extended."

• "Instead, nearly two years after the Order of Dismissal was entered, the City filed the instant Motion to Enforce and the LaVans’ opposed same."
  

• "With respect to counsel’s Certifications, the Court finds that in addition to statements of facts, certain portions of Steven J. Eisenstein and Paul A. Sandars, III’s Certifications filed in  reply to the City’s Motion to Enforce Settlement contain factual arguments that are inappropriate under L.Civ.R. 7.2(a). (See, e.g., ¶¶ 5, 9 and 11 (among others) of the Eisenstein and Sandars’ Certifications).

The certifications the Court was referring to were the lawyers for Linden.

See here for the full Judge's Report.

Council members need to start reading up on Judge's report.  Council should, if it didn't, dismiss these lawyers and not pay their fee.  But what Council did was pay these inappropriate and late filing lawyers fees that exceeded a MILLION DOLLARS.

No one from our own law department oversaw this lawsuit?   No lawyer from our own law department diaryed the 90-day settlement before the matter was dismissed?   Here we are almost 2 and half years later and we are still jerking around with this case?  Hell, I even forgot all about it even though I wrote about it extensively here.  The longer the case goes on, the better for the lawyers, who, in turn, can give more money to political causes, right?

Can I believe any current or new council person can remember this lawsuit or that our own politically-connected lawyers advise our politically council members without a conflict?  I don't think so.    Who do they rely upon when they are called to vote on a settlement?  Do they even review the litigation papers or just go with what the politically-connected lawyers tell them to do?

Can anyone imagine a lawyer taking this long to resolve a dispute, and then charging you more than what you sued for?  It doesn't happen in the real world, for the most part.

And that's what you get when lawyers charge $150 or whatever low figure it is they charged.  Plus they have to make political contributions to get these contracts.

A real Bargain Barn.

Temporary Judges

Interesting article in this week's New Jersey Law Journal regarding the hiring of temporary judges.  Since Linden has added two additional temporary judges, hope Linden and the Union County Assignment Judge have carefully crafted the wording to avert a situation like Paterson.

See here for article.

SS shout out

Holy cow.  Can't even say hello on the commie site.

UCIA Failed Projects

The South Wood Avenue and ISP/Dupont projects began over 10 years ago.  ISP had entered into an agreement with Linden to develop its own property, but Council, in all of its non-wisdom, decided to pull the rug out from under ISP's feet back in 2005.  That ended up in litigation.

 I can't recall when Linden taxpayers were called upon to buy properties on St. George Avenue, including Assemblyman Green's dumps for nearly three-quarters of a Million Dollars, but I believe that failed project, Morning Star, began about 9 years ago.  What do the overtaxed taxpayers of Linden have to show for it?  Those properties we purchased have been taken off the tax rolls and we are paying for bonds on vacant properties, not to mention hundreds of thousands to the connected lawyers and engineers.  Not one Linden elected official publicly questions this.  We're talking millions of dollars, yet who does Councilman Koziol point his finger at during a budget meeting?  Ron from the Linden Economic Development Corp.  I don't seem to recall the LEDC buying properties at the expense or peril of taxpayers.  Either Koziol is too simpleminded or he can't speak to it least it affect the support of the Union County Dem machine.  Probably both.

Council should finally start demanding accountability from the UCIA.  It's a major problem.    Days turn into weeks, weeks into months, months into years and years into decades. 

How Could the DeCotiis Law Firm Not Know?

A partner in a law firm is sending an $8,000 monthly check to former Senator Wayne Bryant and no one in the firm knew about?  If you say so ....

Story here.